KOMPARASI METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING DAN WEIGHTED PRODUCT PADA PEMILIHAN VENDOR BEARING TURBIN DI PT. AZ

Galih Aditya Pangestu, Nina Aini Mahbubah, Purwanto Purwanto

Abstract


This study aims to compare and contrast the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods in supplier selection at a power generation company. The firm challenge with a problem that supplier selection process that remains subjective and based on a single criterion, namely price. This study applies a descriptive quantitative approach using data from fifteen suppliers evaluated on five criteria: price, lead time, quality, delivery accuracy, and capacity. Each step of the SAW and WP methods is systematically described from decision matrix construction, This study aims to compare and contrast the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods in supplier selection at a power generation company. The firm challenge with a problem that supplier selection process that remains subjective and based on a single criterion, namely price. This study applies a descriptive quantitative approach using data from fifteen suppliers evaluated on five criteria: price, lead time, quality, delivery accuracy, and capacity. Each step of the SAW and WP methods is systematically described from decision matrix construction, normalization, to ranking. The results show that both methods yield identical top three rankings, namely suppliers S11, S12, and S14. Ranking differences in two pairs of alternatives with close values. Both methods yield consistent decisions and can serve as an objective basis for supplier selection, to ranking. The results show that both methods yield identical top three rankings, namely suppliers S11, S12, and S14. Ranking differences in two pairs of alternatives with close values. Both methods yield consistent decisions and can serve as an objective basis for supplier selection

Keywords


SAW; WP; supplier; MADM; MCDM; criteria

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Lutfi, T. I. Nasution, N. K. Daulay, dan M. Syahrizal, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan supplier barang elektronik dengan metode assemble AHP-SAW,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 1–8, Jan. 2026.

Z. Muttaqin, D. Handayani, G. Triyno. “Penerapan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam pemilihan supplier terbaik pada industri manufaktur,” Teknika, vol. 13, no. 3, hal. 418–427, 2024, doi: 10.34148/teknika. v13i3.1024.

P. F. Salsana dan E. Yuliawati, “Penerapan metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk pemilihan vendor menempah produk marble,” Jurnal Teknik Industri (Trisakti), vol. 10, no. 1, hal. 1–10, 2021.

M. R. Pratama dan M. A. Jumali, “Pemilihan supplier bahan baku biji plastik menggunakan metode Weighted Product (WP),” JUTIN: Jurnal Teknik Industri Terintegrasi, vol. 7, no. 3, hal. 1688–1695, 2024, doi: 10.31004/jutin. v7i3.30946.

I. Masudin, I. Z. Habibah, R. W. Wardana, D. P. Restuputri, dan S. S. R. Shariff, “Enhancing supplier selection for sustainable raw materials: A comprehensive analysis using ANP and TOPSIS methods,” Logistics, vol. 8, no. 3, art. 74, 2024, doi: 10.3390/logistics8030074.

S. K. Dewi dan Z. S. Ramadhani, “An integrated ANP and MARCOS for green supplier selection: A case study on construction industry,” Jurnal Teknik Industri, vol. 23, no. 2, hal. 133–148, 2022.

Sumanto, L. S. Marita, K. Indriani, L. Mazia, A. Christian, dan R. Amin, “Perbandingan metode Multi Criteria Decision Making (WP, SAW & TOPSIS) untuk pemilihan supplier terbaik,” dalam Prosiding SEMNASIF 2021, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Okt. 2021, hal. 203–213.

I. Y. Pasa, N. W. A. Prasetya, dan R. H. Maharrani, “Analisis perbandingan metode SAW, WP, dan TOPSIS untuk optimasi sistem pendukung keputusan proses seleksi beasiswa Lazizmu,” INTEK: Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 65–76, Mei 2023, doi: 10.37729/intek. v6i1.3147.

E. Dazki, “Komparasi metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dengan Weighted Product (WP) untuk penilaian tenaga kerja Indonesia,” JSiI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, vol. 9, no. 2, hal. 132–140, Sep. 2022.

M. Rani, R. Ardiansyah, dan D. Christina, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan supplier cosmetic dengan metode Weighted Product,” JRTI: Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 77–82, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.29210/3003848000.

R. Fazri, “Perbandingan metode Simple Additive Weighting dan Weighted Product pada keputusan pemberian bantuan (Desa Cisarua, Kabupaten Sukabumi),” JATISI: Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 8, no. 1, hal. 273–286, 2021.

B. Wibowo, A. Jianto, D. Master, R. B. Lesmana, dan T. R. V. Yulianto, “Analisis perbandingan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weighted Product (WP) dalam pemilihan customer service terbaik,” Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika, vol. 7, no. 1, 2022.

E. N. Hayati, W. A. Jauhari, R. W. Damayanti, C. N. Rosyidi, dan M. H. F. B. M. Fauadi, “A framework for sustainable supplier selection integrating grey forecasting and F-MCDM methods: A case study,” Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, vol. 24, no. 1, 2025.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/sigmateknika.v9i1.9101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





E-ISSN 2599-0616

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Sigma Teknika

Gedung Lt.1 Kampus Universitas Riau Kepulauan Batam

Jl. Batu Aji Baru No.99 Batu Aji

Email: sigmateknika@journal.unrika.ac.id

 

 

Web Analytics